| |
Unbelievable health claims from Univ. of Guelph graduate student
I have been following the recent events concerning professor Julie Conquer and Derek Woodgate, a student at the University of Guelph, in regards to a new diet pill named Calorie-Care. Two recent CKCO-TV news shows focused on the product made by NXCARE, Inc. I also have the original satellite broadcast made on April 29, 2003. I am utterly shocked by what I saw, and heard, not to mention the ethical consideration which have been raised by many people, and the press.
SatelliteB-ROLL advisory from Canada Newswire -
This advisory claims that their research demonstrated that Calorie-Care was 100% effective for weight loss over a six week period. This in and of itself could be highly suspect. Nothing in this world is 100% effective for anything. That is question number one.
Question number two is whether or not the original research paper had
been published in Current Therapeutics Research at the time of the
broadcast. The fact is that it had not been published.
The advisory told the MEDIA to contact:
"Prof. Julie Conquer, Department of Human Biology and Nutritional
Sciences, Director, Human Nutraceutical Research Unit (519) 824-4120,
Ext. 53749."
Current Therapeutic Research has previously published studies of a
number of other diet pills. One of them you may remember was Xenadrine.
If you recall that particular ephedra containing diet pill was
implicated in numerous deaths across North America. So, the fact that
Current Therapeutic Research publishes studies on diet pills somehow
leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. There are scores of sites around
the internet that still use the CTR study to hype dangerous diet pills.
They can't do anything about it, but I wish they could. Why doesn't that
journal warn the public? That's the least that they could do.
I follow diet frauds and diet scams and run three web sites about health
fraud. After I saw the CKCO broadcast, and news articles in the paper
this week, and went to the NXCARE.COM web site, it not only left me with
my mouth hanging open, I was at a loss for words and had a bad taste in
my mouth trying to figure out the University of Guelph's angle here.
University of Guelph public affairs press release seemed to be timed to coincide with the launch of launch of NXCARE's broadcast.
How in the world did the Guelph University's HNRU (Human Nutrition
Research Unit) ever approve the original research? How in the world did
a graduate student ever put together enough support and financing to
proceed with a startup nutraceutical company while working in research a
the University of Guelph? I understand that $100,000 was available for
some of this specific research a few years ago. Woodgate's web site
clearly makes claims that there are a number of additional studies that
the company is either directly, or indirectly involved with around the
world. Is the University of Guelph involved in this, too?
I have been unable to find what their website calls the NXCARE
Nutraceutical Research Institute in the Federal database of non-profits,
but I was able to find this on the Canadian government's database:
NUTRITION & NUTRACEUTICAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION OF HEALTH CLAIMS INC.
While the Calorie Care diet pill is not particularly dangerous, the idea
that a graduate student, with or without the approval of a major
university such as Guelph, to have any part in marketing this is a
serious ethical matter. When CKCO TV was contacted and viewed the
satellite feed from the company called NXCARE Inc. they were alarmed and
devoted stories on their news two nights in a row. Their opinion was
then and still is that this is a conflict of interest. Yet, the
University of Guelph was aware of this and did not intervene. Who is running the ethics panel at the university when it comes to
nutraceutical research? That's what CKCO can't understand, and neither do I.
The published Calorie Care study was very small, it was not long term, and the claims
made for the products are absurd on the NXCARE.COM web site. Secondly,
as you will see below, two of their major ingredients that are in other diet pills have been condemned and vigorously prosecuted by the FTC over the years.
Julie Conquer was also the principle investigator for MuscleTech's "Hydroxycut":
"EFFECT OF EXERCISE AND HYDROXYCUT ON BODY COMPOSITION AND BODY WEIGHT IN OBESE MEN - PHASE II
28 Feb to 28 Aug 2001
with TE Graham"
Questions for the University of Guelph
1. Why would they allow a graduate student to do a study that involved
these ingredients in the first place.
2. Why would they allow a him to set up a for-profit corporation that
uses the name of the senior researcher who helped with the study, and
the name of the University of Guelph in their promotions?
3. Who paid for the video production and the satellite broadcast?
4. Who really owns NXCARE Inc. and where is it registered?
5. Is NXCARE Inc. a U.S. or Canadian company?
6. Why does it do business out of a Mail Boxes Etc. franchise in Guelph
and a maildrop, shipping company in Tonawanda?
7. Where is the Calorie Care actually made, bottled, and shipped from?
8. Who sat on the committee that reviewed this research?
9. Did anyone at the University of Guelph complain, and if they did, who
were they, and what did they say, and to whom did they say it?
10. There was $100,000 devoted to the original research study. Where did
the funding originate, and was any of the money not spent on the study
itself.
11. Who scripted Dr. Conquer's portion of the video?
Who is actually behind the NXCARE company?
Internet Registration for NXCARE - Note that this registration belongs to Derek Woodgate, the researcher (PhD student) who was the investigator. This is obviously a conflict of interest if I
ever saw one.
Note how there is no Canadian address, but there is one in Tonawanda, NY. That's really interesting isn't it. Tonawanda is right near Niagara
Falls, NY. It would appear to be a mail drop called M&M Forwarding. Many companies use this address for shipping products.
The address for NXCARE is in reality is a MBE (Mail Boxes Etc.) franchise location.
BULLFROG MALL
28 - 380 ERAMOSA ROAD
GUELPH, ONTARIO N1E 7E1, CANADA
Who is Derek Woodgate, and what else does he do besides working on his PhD research at the University of Guelph?
- Derek Woodgate is listed in the ASPEN
(American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition) membership
database as a "PH". Woodgate is not a PhD. He only has a masters
degree and is described below. Was this simply an error when he filled
out the database, or was it intentional?
"Derek","Woodgate","Derek Woodgate PH","","14 Langford
Court","","Brampton","ON","L6W 4K4","Canada","9056783119","","","1034014"
Where is NXCARE, Inc. registered or incorporated? - I couldn't find it registered on the Canadian government's Strategis business database. It may be on the Ontario database.
Ingredients:
Konplex - glucomannan
FTC has serious concerns about
this ingredient -
Lipidbloc - It's only Chitosan, which is basically ground-up shellfish exoskeletons. If you remember the recent FTC actions
against Fat Blaster, you will recognize this ingredient. You should know that the FTC has held Enforma, the company that makes this junk, in contempt of court.
Guess what? Fat Blaster is still on the market in Canada.:
THE BOTTOM LINE
- WHY WOULD THE UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH HAVE CONTINUED WITH THIS RESEARCH
KNOWING THAT BOTH CHITOSAN AND GLUCOMANNAN HAVE BEEN ATTACKED BY THE
FTC? WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT SMALL FINES HERE, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT
TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, AND CONTEMPT OF COURT CITATIONS ISSUED
AGAINST SOME OF THESE COMPANIES.
DID THE UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH JUST IGNORE THIS?
- IN ADDITION WHERE DID THE $100,000 COME FROM TO FUND THE RESEARCH?
- WHERE IS IT MANUFACTURED?
- WHO REGULATES THIS PRODUCT AND ITS CLAIMS IN CANADA?
- WHO ARE THE "DOCTORS" THAT RECOMMEND IT?
- WHY DID THEIR REVIEW OF RESEARCH NOT CONSIDER THE FACT THAT THE FTC
FOUND MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH THESE INGREDIENTS AND TOOK ACTION AGAINST
COMPANIES THAT MADE WILD CLAIMS?
- WILL THE UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH ADDRESS THIS AND TELL THE PUBLIC WHAT IT
WILL DO TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE UNIVERSITY?
|